Knowledge and skills for money management-Mod/High-Favorable impacts

Recently Added

CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.

Search
for studies on
this topic using
keywords
and filters

Displaying 1 - 10 of 13

A randomized controlled trial of a financial literacy curriculum for survivors of intimate partner violence (Hetling et al., 2015)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Moving Ahead Through Money Management intervention on financial knowledge and behaviors. The study was a randomized controlled trial…
Do not swipe the small stuff: A randomized evaluation of rules of thumb‐based financial education (Theodos et al., 2020)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of debt management rules of thumb on credit card debt reduction. The study was a randomized controlled trial that assigned individuals to one of…
Assessing financial education: Evidence from boot camp (Skimmyhorn, 2016)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Personal Financial Management Course (PFMC) on financial behaviors. The study used a difference-in-differences design to compare outcomes…
An evaluation of the impacts and implementation approaches of financial coaching programs (Theodos et al., 2015)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of financial coaching on financial behaviors. This profile focuses on the intervention based in Miami, Florida. The authors investigated similar…
An evaluation of the impacts and implementation approaches of financial coaching programs (Theodos et al., 2015)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of financial coaching on financial behaviors. This profile focuses on the intervention based in New York City. The authors investigated similar…
An analysis of first-year freshmen financial literacy and the effectiveness of an online financial education program at small four-year private universities (Woolsey, 2011)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the USA Funds Life Skills Financial Literacy program on financial knowledge. The study was a randomized controlled trial. First year college…
Outcomes of on-line financial education for chronically ill rural women (Haynes et al., 2011)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of an online financial education module on financial knowledge. This profile focuses on the comparison between the less intensive intervention group…
Outcomes of on-line financial education for chronically ill rural women (Haynes et al., 2011)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of an online financial education module on financial knowledge. This profile focuses on the comparison between the intensive intervention group and the…
Financial education and savings outcomes for low-income IDA participants: Does age make a difference? (Grinstein-Weiss et al., 2015)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of participation in an Individual Development Accounts (IDA) program on savings for individuals living in poverty. The study used a matched…
Evaluating a financial education curriculum as an intervention to improve financial behaviors and financial well-being of survivors of domestic violence: Results from a longitudinal randomized controlled study (Postmus et al., 2015)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Moving Ahead Through Financial Management program on financial knowledge, financial intentions, and financial behavior outcomes. The study…

CLEAR Icon Key

Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.

High Causal Evidence

Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence

Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence

Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis

Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis

Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis

Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable

Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.