Knowledge and skills for financial decision making-Mod/High-Favorable impacts

Recently Added

CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.

Search
for studies on
this topic using
keywords
and filters

Displaying 1 - 10 of 10

A randomized controlled trial of a financial literacy curriculum for survivors of intimate partner violence (Hetling et al., 2015)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Moving Ahead Through Money Management intervention on financial knowledge and behaviors. The study was a randomized controlled trial…
Serenity now, save later? Evidence on retirement savings puzzles from a 401(K) field experiment (Bhargava & Conell-Price, 2022)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of informational and incentive-based interventions on retirement savings behavior. This profile focuses on the individuals who were contributing the 4…
Serenity now, save later? Evidence on retirement savings puzzles from a 401(K) field experiment (Bhargava & Conell-Price, 2022)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of informational and incentive-based interventions on retirement savings behavior. This profile focuses on the individuals who were contributing less…
Financial education interventions targeting immigrants and children of immigrants: Results from a randomized control trial (Barcellos et al., 2016)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of newly designed educational materials, adapted from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) Money Smart curriculum, on immigrants’…
Financial education interventions targeting immigrants and children of immigrants: Results from a randomized control trial (Barcellos et al., 2016)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of newly designed educational materials, adapted from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) Money Smart curriculum, on immigrants’…
Financial education interventions targeting immigrants and children of immigrants: Results from a randomized control trial (Barcellos et al., 2016)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of newly designed educational materials, adapted from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation’s (FDIC) Money Smart curriculum, on immigrants’…
Evaluating a financial education curriculum as an intervention to improve financial behaviors and financial well-being of survivors of domestic violence: Results from a longitudinal randomized controlled study (Postmus et al., 2015)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Moving Ahead Through Financial Management program on financial knowledge, financial intentions, and financial behavior outcomes. The study…
Using vignettes to improve understanding of Social Security and annuities (Samek et al., 2022)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of vignettes about financial planning on financial knowledge. The study was a randomized controlled trial and used data from the Understanding…
Visual tools and narratives: New ways to improve financial literacy (Lusardi et al., 2017)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of financial literacy training provided in four different formats (video narrative, written narrative, informational brochure, interactive visual…
Visual tools and narratives: New ways to improve financial literacy (Lusardi et al., 2017)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of financial literacy training provided in four different formats (video narrative, written narrative, informational brochure, interactive visual…

CLEAR Icon Key

Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.

High Causal Evidence

Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence

Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence

Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis

Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis

Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis

Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable

Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.