Health and safety-Mod/high-Favorable impacts

Recently Added

CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.

Search
for studies on
this topic using
keywords
and filters

Displaying 1 - 10 of 25

A randomized controlled trial of an employment program for veterans transitioning from the military: Two-year outcomes (Bond et al., 2022)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the National Career Coach Program (NCCP) on employment, earnings and wages, and health and safety for transitioning veterans. The study was a…
Comparative effectiveness of training alternatives for the EPA’s Worker Protection Standard regulation among immigrant Latino farmworkers (Grzywacz et al., 2022)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Worker Protection Standard (WPS) Entrenamiento de Pesticidas e Insolación que es Culturalmente Apropiada (PISCA) training on pesticide safety…
Employment services utilization and outcomes among substance abusing offenders participating in California's Proposition 36 drug treatment initiative (Evans et al., 2010)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of California's Proposition 36-funded employment services on employment, earnings, public benefit receipt, and health and safety. Using outcome…
Effect of a brief mindfulness-based program on stress in healthcare professionals at a U.S. biomedical research hospital (Ameli et al., 2020)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a brief mindfulness-based self-care (MBSC) program on health outcomes among health care workers. The study used a randomized controlled trial…
Feasibility and preliminary outcomes of a Brief Mindfulness-Based Intervention (BMBI) to decrease stress and improve well-being in secondary school teachers (Roberts, 2020)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of a brief mindfulness-based intervention on the health and wellness outcomes. This study was a randomized controlled trial assessing the…
Positive impact of IPS supported employment on PTSD-related occupational-psychosocial functional outcomes: Results from a VA randomized-controlled trial (Mueller et. al, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Individual Placement and Support (IPS) supported employment on mental well-being as it pertains to everyday functioning (work or school life and…
Testing two subsidized employment models for TANF recipients: Final impacts and costs of the Los Angeles County transitional subsidized employment program (Anderson et al., 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of two approaches to subsidized employment for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients: Paid Work Experience (PWE) in the…
Long-term impacts of the CARE program on teachers' self-reported social and emotional competence and well-being (Jennings et al., 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Cultivating Awareness and Resilience in Education (CARE) program on psychological distress and physical health. The CARE program is a mindfulness-…
Effectiveness of an energy management training course on employee well-being: a randomized controlled trial (Das et al., 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: Moderate Causal Evidence
The study's objective was to examine the impact of an employee well-being program on general health, mental health, physical functioning, role limitations due to emotional problems, role…
Effectiveness of a no-cost-to-workers, slip-resistant footwear program for reducing slipping-related injuries in food service workers: a cluster randomized trial (Bell, Collins & Chiou, 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Causal Evidence Rating: High Causal Evidence
The report's objective was to examine the impact of a no-cost-to-workers, slip-resistant footwear (SRF) program on slip-related work injuries. This study is a cluster-level randomized…

CLEAR Icon Key

Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.

High Causal Evidence

Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence

Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence

Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis

Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis

Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis

Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable

Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence

The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence

The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence

The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence

The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.