Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 1 - 10 of 69
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to determine whether a job skills training intervention, the Job Seekers’ Workshop (JSW), improved employment outcomes and reduced alcohol use among an American Indian…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of a therapeutic workplace on employment, earnings and wages, and public benefits receipt. This study used a randomized controlled trial. …Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of California's Proposition 36-funded employment services on employment, earnings, public benefit receipt, and health and safety. Using outcome…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of an integrated drug counseling and employment intervention on employment, earnings, drug use, and HIV risk behaviors among clients in methadone…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of text messages on health and safety knowledge and behaviors. This study used a nonexperimental design to compare ergonomics knowledge and…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a brief mindfulness-based self-care (MBSC) program on health outcomes among health care workers. The study used a randomized controlled trial…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Stand and Move at Work intervention on health outcomes. This study was a randomized controlled trial. Using data collected via…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of a brief mindfulness-based intervention on the health and wellness outcomes. This study was a randomized controlled trial assessing the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Long-Lasting Permethrin-Impregnated (LLPI) clothing on health and safety outcomes. This study was a randomized controlled trial assessing the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Behavioral Activation therapy with a goal of returning to work (BA-W) on employment and health outcomes. The study used an interrupted time…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.