Related Studies
Compensation and Workplace Conditions > Health and Safety > Substance abuse recovery
Displaying 21 - 30 of 30
Compensation and Workplace Conditions > Health and Safety > Substance abuse recovery
Bergseth, K., & McDonald, T. (2007). Reentry services: An evaluation of a pilot project in Clay County, MN. Fargo, ND: North Dakota State University, Department of Criminal Justice and Political Science.
Topic Area: Justice-Involved Youth
Topic Area: Opportunities for Youth
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Mackin, J., Lucas, L., Lambarth, C., Waller, M., Herrera, A., Carey, S., & Finigan, M. (2010). St. Mary’s County juvenile drug court outcome and cost evaluation. Portland, OR: NPC Research.
Topic Area: Justice-Involved Youth
Topic Area: Opportunities for Youth
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Hunter, S. B., & Huang, C. Y. (2014). Substance Use Treatment and Reentry (STAR) program: Final evaluation report. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
Topic Area: Reentry
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
- Employment-Low-Unfavorable impactsEmployment
Lane, J., Turner, S., Fain, T., & Sehgal, A. (2007). The effects of an experimental intensive juvenile probation program on self-reported delinquency and drug use. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 3(3), 201-219.
Topic Area: Justice-Involved Youth
Topic Area: Opportunities for Youth
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Martinez, J., Azurdia, G., Bloom, D., and Miller, C. (2009). The Employment Retention and Advancement project: Results from the Substance Abuse Case Management program in New York City. New York: MDRC.
Topic Area: Low-Income Adults
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
Drebing, C. E., Van Ormer, E. A., Krebs, C., Rosenheck, R., & Rounsaville, B. (2005). The impact of enhanced incentives on vocational rehabilitation outcomes for dually diagnosed veterans. Journal of Applied Behavioral Analysis, 38(3), 359-372.
Topic Area: Veterans
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
- Earnings and wages-Low-Favorable impactsEarnings and wages
- Employment-Low-No impactsEmployment
- Health and safety-Low-Favorable impactsHealth and safety
Webster, J. M., Staton-Tindall, M., Dickson, M. F., Wilson, J. F., & Leukefeld, C. G. (2014). Twelve-month employment intervention outcomes for drug-involved offenders. American Journal of Drug & Alcohol Abuse, 40(3), 200-205.
Topic Area: Reentry
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
- Earnings and wages-Low-No impactsEarnings and wages
- Employment-Low-Favorable impactsEmployment
Penk, W., Drebing, C.E., Rosenheck, R.A., Krebs, C., Van Ormer, A., & Mueller, L. (2010). Veterans Health Administration transitional work experience vs. job placement in veterans with co-morbid substance use and non-psychotic psychiatric disorders. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 33(4), 297-307.
Topic Area: Veterans
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
- Earnings and wages-Low-Favorable impactsEarnings and wages
- Employment-Low-Favorable impactsEmployment
Butler, D., Alson, J., Bloom, D., Deitch, V., Hill, A., Hsueh, J., Jacobs, E., Kim, S., McRoberts, R., & Redcross, C. (2012). What strategies work for the hard-to-employ? Final results of the Hard-to-Employ demonstration and evaluation project and selected sites from the Employment Retention and Advancement project. (OPRE report 2012-08). Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [Minnesota Tier 2]
Topic Area: Low-Income Adults
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
- Earnings and wages-Mod/high-Favorable impactsEarnings and wages
- Employment-Mod/high-Favorable impactsEmployment
- Public benefits receipt-Low-Favorable impactsPublic benefit receipt
Butler, D., Alson, J., Bloom, D., Deitch, V., Hill, A., Hsueh, J., Jacobs, E., Kim, S., McRoberts, R., & Redcross, C. (2012). What strategies work for the hard-to-employ? Final results of the hard-to-employ demonstration and evaluation project and selected sites from the Employment Retention and Advancement project. (OPRE Report 2012-08.) Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. [NYC SACM]
Topic Area: Low-Income Adults
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
- Earnings and wages-Low-No impactsEarnings and wages
- Employment-Low-No impactsEmployment
- Public benefits receipt-Low-No impactsPublic benefit receipt