Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 61 - 70 of 150
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Northeast Resiliency Consortium (NRC) on education, earnings, and employment outcomes. This summary focuses on the comprehensive support…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Northeast Resiliency Consortium (NRC) on education, earnings, and employment outcomes. This summary focuses on the continuing education to…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Retraining the Gulf Coast Workforce through Information Technology Pathways Consortium (Gulf Coast IT Pathways) grant program on education…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Greater Memphis Alliance for a Competitive Workforce (GMACW) Trade Adjustment Assistance Community College and Career Training (TAACCCT) grant…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Saddleback College’s Fast Track to Success program on student education outcomes. The study used a nonexperimental design to compare the outcomes…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to assess the impact of the grant-funded Implementing an Island-wide Strategy for Industry Cluster Formation and Community Revitalization in Hawai'i (C3T) project on…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the CyberSecurity Career Pathways Program (CSCPP) on education, earnings, and employment outcomes. The authors used a nonexperimental design to…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of a cohort-based learning model within a certificate program at a community college on the students’ education completion rate. Using community…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Industrial Automation Manufacturing innovative Strategic Training Achieving Results (IAM iSTAR) initiative on education outcomes. The authors…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Training for Regional Energy in North Dakota (TREND) program on education outcomes. The authors used a nonexperimental design to compare…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Domain
Effectiveness icon
