Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of YouthBuild AmeriCorps programs that grant a high school equivalency credential (HSE-only) on employment, and education and training. The authors…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of YouthBuild AmeriCorps programs that grant both a HSE and Diploma (Combined HSE/Diploma) on employment, and education and training. The authors…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the New Orleans Office of Workforce Development (OWD) Career Pathways training program on employment, earnings, and job satisfaction. This…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of Compensatory Cognitive Training (CCT) on attaining competitive employment, weeks worked, wages earned, mental illness symptom severity, and…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of monetary incentives on absences from work for adolescents employed in part-time jobs. The study used an interrupted time series…Interactive theater: An effective tool to reduce gender bias in faculty searches (Shea et al., 2019)
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the Gender Equity and Recruitment of Underrepresented People (GEAR UP) workshop on employment. The study used an interrupted time…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the motion picture incentive (MPI) program on employment in the motion picture industry. The authors investigated similar research questions for…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) Medicaid expansion on transitioning from employment to unemployment, from full-time to…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the motion picture incentive (MPI) program on employment in the motion picture industry. The authors investigated similar research…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the motion picture incentive (MPI) program on employment in the motion picture industry. The authors investigated similar research questions for…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.