Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 151 - 160 of 776
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of court-ordered affirmative action policies on the representation of white women, black men, and black women employed in managerial positions. The…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of court-ordered establishment of new diversity-focused staff or offices on the representation of white women, black men, and black women employed…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of court-ordered use of employee performance reviews and progress reports on the representation of white women, black men, and black women employed…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of court-ordered employer compliance monitoring plans on the representation of white women, black men, and black women employed in managerial…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of court-ordered establishment of employee grievance procedures on the representation of white women, black men, and black women employed in…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of court-ordered requirements to post Equal Employment Opportunity (EEO) notices within workplace establishments on the representation of white…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of court-ordered requirements to inform protected classes of employer laws and legal settlements on the representation of white women, black men,…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of 2005 reform to the Employees' Retirement System of Rhode Island (ERSRI) on employee separation. The reform enacted reductions to retirement…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study examined the impact of enforcement of age discrimination laws on the employment and earnings of older male workers The author used a nonexperimental regression model and data from the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of workforce partnership programs on employment and earnings outcomes. This profile focuses on the evaluation of the Partners for a Competitive…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.