Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 71 - 80 of 105
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Credentials to Careers (C2C) program on earnings. The authors used a nonexperimental design to compare outcomes of C2C participants to a…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Northeast Resiliency Consortium (NRC) on education, earnings, and employment outcomes. This summary focuses on the comprehensive support…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the CyberSecurity Career Pathways Program (CSCPP) on education, earnings, and employment outcomes. The authors used a nonexperimental design to…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Pathways to Engineering Technology Careers (PETC) program on earnings and employment outcomes. Using student surveys and wage data, the study…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Iowa Advanced Manufacturing Consortium (I-AM) on welding student’s education, earnings, and employment outcomes. The study used a…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to assess the impact of TAACCCT-funded programming offered at National Information Security & Geospatial Technology Consortium (NISGTC) colleges on educational and…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to evaluate the impact of a competency-based education (CBE) program offered by Salt Lake Community College on educational, employment, and earnings outcomes. The study…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Health Professions Pathways (H2P) Consortium on education, earnings, and employment outcomes. The study used a nonexperimental design to…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the Vincennes University Logistics Training and Education Center (LTEC) initiative on employment and earnings outcomes. This summary focuses on the…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to assess the impact of Project IMPACT on education, earnings, and employment outcomes. Using academic records from the college as well as data obtained from the Kentucky…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
