Recently Added
CLEAR searches the existing literature for research relevant to this topic area's focus. Browse the most recently reviewed research below.
Displaying 31 - 40 of 170
Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of New Jersey’s Family Leave Insurance Program (NJ-FLI) on labor force participation and other labor market outcomes for women with children. The…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of Prudence Kay Poppink (PKP) Act on employment outcomes. The study was a nonexperimental design using data that was reported in…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study's objective was to examine the impact of the California Paid Family Leave Program (CA-PFL) on employment and wages. The study used a difference-in-differences analysis to…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of court-ordered diversity training on the representation of white women, black men, and black women employed in managerial positions. The authors…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of court-ordered affirmative action policies on the representation of white women, black men, and black women employed in managerial positions. The…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of court-ordered use of employee performance reviews and progress reports on the representation of white women, black men, and black women employed…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of court-ordered employer compliance monitoring plans on the representation of white women, black men, and black women employed in managerial…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the motion picture incentive (MPI) program on employment in the motion picture industry. The authors investigated similar research questions for…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study examines the impact of Occupational Licensing (holding an active job certification or license) on hourly wages, weekly earnings, and hours worked per week. Using data from…Study Type: Causal Impact Analysis
The study’s objective was to examine the impact of the motion picture incentive (MPI) program on employment in the motion picture industry. The authors investigated similar research questions for…
CLEAR Icon Key
Below is a key for icons used to indicate important details about a study, such as its type, evidence rating, and outcome findings.
High Causal Evidence
Strong evidence the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Moderate Causal Evidence
Evidence that the effects are caused to some degree by the examined intervention.
Low Causal Evidence
Little evidence that the effects are caused by the examined intervention.
Causal Impact Analysis
Uses quantitative methods to assess the effectiveness of a program, policy, or intervention.
Descriptive Analysis
Describes a program, policy, or intervention using qualitative or quantitative methods.
Implementation Analysis
Examines the implementation of a program, policy, or intervention.
Favorable
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts.
Mixed
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain.
None
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain.
Unfavorable
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts.
Not applicable
Not applicable because no outcomes were examined in the outcome domain.
Favorable - low evidence
The study found at least one favorable impact in the outcome domain, and no unfavorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Mixed - low evidence
The study found some favorable and some unfavorable impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
None - low evidence
The study found no statistically significant impacts in the outcome domain. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
Unfavorable - low evidence
The study found at least one unfavorable impact in the outcome domain, and no favorable impacts. The study received a low causal evidence ratings so these findings should be interpreted with caution.
